Idea 1: If Jesus is out there, consequently God happens to be an omnipresent being.
Assumption 2: If Jesus is an omnipresent simply being, then no preset excludes Him.
Philosophy 3: There certainly is a couple of stuff that aren’t God, refer to it S.
Philosophy 4. Either God is S, or goodness is definitely left out from S.
Principle 5: If God is during S, consequently goodness is not Lord, a contradiction.
Idea 6: Lord happens to be excluded from S.
Assumption 7: If God is definitely omitted from S, after that God will never be omnipresent.
Idea 8: So, goodness is not omnipresent.
Conclusion: Therefore, goodness does not can be found.
[seeing that the point merely seated truth be told there, youve got to claim two things concerning this, explaining the properties and this type of.]
This point is definitely deductively valid. Idea 1 follows from typical expectation about Gods land. Presumably this is often uncontroversial.
Principle 2 converts the thought of omnipresence into preset theoretic terms. Its while using proven fact that an omnipresent existence happens to be all over the place, therefore really in each set.
Assumption 3 is clearly real, because no body claims that all item try goodness. Very, it’s wise to mention to those non-God things together as a certain.
Assumption 4 uses from your axioms of put principle, as well as maybe not controversial.
Philosophy 5 comes after from your concept of the fix S, since variety of those activities which are not Jesus. Very, if God is in S, next Jesus is certainly not goodness.